Close Menu
The Daily Hoosier
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • IU basketball: Bold predictions for the 2026-27 season
    • IU football now controls its own destiny to reach 2026 Big Ten title game
    • Here’s an initial look at where IU football stands in the race to the Big Ten Championship game
    • Hasn’t changed a bit: Curt Cignetti’s introductions at IUP and Elon
    • IU women’s basketball improves to 2-0 with dominant 96-55 victory over Southern Illinois
    • IU basketball floating head posters return for 2026-27
    • Report: IU football actively looking for 2027 Power 4 nonconference opponent
    • IU basketball: Bellarmine at Indiana — The report card
    • Sign Up
    • About/Support
    • Jobs
    • Tickets
      • IUBB Tickets (Stubhub)
      • IUFB Tickets (Stubhub)
    • Shop
      • IU NIL Store
      • IU Adidas Store
      • Amazon: Support TDH
      • Official IU Store
      • IU Memorabilia
      • IU Press (Books)
      • The Daily Hoosier T-Shirt
    • Radio/Podcasts
      • East 17th Street
    • Pro IU
      • IUBB NBA
      • IUFB NFL
      • IUBASE MLB
    • Hoosier History
      • Basketball History
      • March Madness Classics
      • Football History
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    The Daily HoosierThe Daily Hoosier
    Sunday, November 8
    • IU Football
      • Latest IU Football News
      • IU Football 2026 Schedule
      • Current roster
      • 2026 IUFB Stats
      • 2026 B1G Standings
      • Future opponents through 2032
      • IU Football 2026 Record Book
    • IU Basketball
      • Latest IU Basketball News
      • 2026-27 IU Basketball Roster
      • 2026-27 IU Basketball Schedule
      • Scholarship Chart
      • Big Ten Standings
      • IU Basketball Stats
      • Future Schedules
      • Rankings & Bracketology
      • IU Basketball Media Guide
    • IU Recruiting
      • IU Basketball Recruiting News
      • IU Football Recruiting News
      • IUBB 2027-29 Offers
      • IU Football Recruiting Commits
    • IU Women’s Basketball
      • IU Women’s Basketball News
      • 26-27 Schedule
      • Big Ten Standings
    • IU Men’s Soccer
      • 2025 Schedule
    • More Hoosiers
      • IU Baseball
        • Baseball Schedule
        • Statistics
        • Big Ten Standings
      • IU Swim & Dive
      • IU Olympic Results
    The Daily Hoosier

    IU football: Three quick reasons the Hoosiers beat UCLA, highlights, stats

    Mike SchumannBy Mike SchumannOctober 25, 2025 IU Football 8 Comments
    Photo by Owen Graham for TDH
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    BLOOMINGTON, Ind. — Indiana beat UCLA by a final score of 56-6 on Saturday afternoon at Memorial Stadium.

    Below are three quick reasons why the Hoosiers won, along with highlights and final stats.  For Curt Cignetti postgame, GO HERE.

    Indiana (8-0) is back on the road next weekend.  They travel to Maryland for a 3:30 p.m. ET kickoff in College Park.

    Stay tuned for more coverage of the game from The Daily Hoosier.

    ——————————————————

    THREE QUICK REASONS INDIANA WON

    1. Defense sets the tone.  Linebacker Aiden Fisher got an interception on the second play of the game and returned it 25 yards for a touchdown.  The Bruins only had nine yards on their first four drives, they fumbled on their fifth, and punted on their sixth.  Indiana was up 28-0 by that point.  Although Fisher left the game with an injury, his backup Isaiah Jones led the team with eight tackles.  Indiana had three takeaways, seven tackles for loss and three sacks.

    2. A balanced and dominant offensive attack.  As has been the case for the entire season, Indiana was effective both on the ground and through the air.  Quarterback Fernando Mendoza completed 15 of 22 passes for 168 yards and three TDs.  He also rushed five times for 45 yards and another score.  That was part of a rushing attack that gained 262 yards.  Roman Hemby led the way with 81 rushing yards and two scores on the ground, while Kaelon Black added 70.  Indiana amassed 475 yards of total offense vs. 201 for UCLA.

    3.  Third down discrepancy.  UCLA couldn’t get Indiana’s offense off the field.  The Bruins’ offense couldn’t stay on it.  UCLA was just 1 of 11 on third downs and 1 of 3 on fourth, while IU was 12 of 16 and 2 of 2.  That led to a 36-24 time of possession advantage for Indiana, and the Hoosiers ran 23 more plays.  Indiana’s offense was able stay on schedule.  They allowed just one tackle for loss and no sacks.

    HIGHLIGHTS

    FINAL STATS

    Image

    Image

    For complete coverage of IU football, GO HERE.


    The Daily Hoosier –“Where Indiana fans assemble when they’re not at Assembly”

    – Join our Premium Discord Chat by GOING HERE.

    • You can follow us on X: @daily_hoosier and find us on Facebook and Instagram 
    • Seven ways to support completely free IU coverage at no cost to you.
    UCLA
    Mike Schumann

    Keep Reading

    IU football now controls its own destiny to reach 2026 Big Ten title game

    Here’s an initial look at where IU football stands in the race to the Big Ten Championship game

    Hasn’t changed a bit: Curt Cignetti’s introductions at IUP and Elon

    Latest Hoosier News
    • IU basketball: Bold predictions for the 2026-27 season
    • IU football now controls its own destiny to reach 2026 Big Ten title game
    • Here’s an initial look at where IU football stands in the race to the Big Ten Championship game
    • Hasn’t changed a bit: Curt Cignetti’s introductions at IUP and Elon
    • IU women’s basketball improves to 2-0 with dominant 96-55 victory over Southern Illinois
    • IU basketball floating head posters return for 2026-27
    • Report: IU football actively looking for 2027 Power 4 nonconference opponent
    Sign Up



    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    © 2026 The Daily Hoosier, LLC.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.